This section addresses the effective dissemination of systematic review findings to maximize their impact.
Information
This section addresses the effective dissemination of systematic review findings to maximize their impact.
Crafting a systematic review with clarity and detail and disseminating it effectively ensures that your research reaches the most appropriate audience, thus maximizing its impact. According to the Ohio State University Health Sciences Library, selecting the appropriate medium for publication is crucial for effective dissemination ("What Are the Steps of a Systematic Review? - Systematic Reviews - LibGuides at Ohio State University-Health Sciences Library, n.d."). Journals, conferences, and symposiums, details of which are often listed on their websites, are common platforms for publication.
When submitting a paper, it is essential to engage editors and reviewers positively. The manuscript must be meticulously prepared, free of typographical errors, and adhere to the formatting guidelines of the target publication. Consistency in typography, citation style, and logical structure, as well as adhering to word count limits, are also critical for acceptance. These elements are emphasized across various guides on writing and submitting scientific papers (Day & Gastel, 2012). Systematic reviews serve to close knowledge gaps and provide evidence that can significantly influence policymaking and practice. As described by Grant and Booth in their framework on typologies of reviews, systematic reviews are characterized by a methodical and reproducible methodology, which includes extensive literature searches and clear reporting of review processes (Grant & Booth, 2009). The process involves several distinct phases: planning, conducting, and analyzing/reporting. Initially, the planning phase involves defining the research question, conducting survey research, developing the protocol, and establishing the conceptual framework. The execution phase demands a comprehensive and transparent literature review to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the findings. During the analysis and reporting phase, researchers must document their findings, extract themes, and synthesize the results effectively. The culmination of these efforts is the publication of the review, aimed at delivering the findings to an audience that can implement the research in practical settings.
By adhering to these structured phases and emphasizing methodological transparency, researchers can significantly contribute to the scientific literature, advancing knowledge and informing practice effectively. This approach not only enhances the validity of the research findings but also ensures their applicability in real-world settings, thereby contributing to the ongoing advancement of scientific knowledge and practice (Moher et al., 2015). In conclusion, systematic reviews are a sound research methodology for contributing to the scientific literature. By using this methodology effectively, researchers increase their knowledge and contribute to the cumulative progress of science.
Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2012). How to write and publish a scientific paper (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511762805
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., Estarli, M., Barrera, E. S. A., Martínez-Rodríguez, R., Baladia, E., Agüero, S. D., Camacho, S., Buhring, K., Herrero-López, A., Gil-González, D. M., Altman, D. G., Booth, A., … Whitlock, E. (2016). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica, 20(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1/TABLES/4